Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

74562

in Rattan, OklahomaPopulation 724

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

32.48/ 100

Ranked #30,181 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.9%)

Ranked #538 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

63.5%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

26.9 mi

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.1%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

26.3%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.3%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.0%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.2%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Rattan, Oklahoma (ZIP 74562) comes out in the bottom 5.9% nationally (30,181st) and the bottom 15% of Oklahoma (538th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 2.6% nationally, and modeled pfas lands in the bottom 6.9% nationally. By contrast, modeled mammography is in the bottom 1.8% nationally, hearing disability resides in the top 4.2% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 6.4% nationally, and cognitive disability sits in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled energy burden settles in the top 6.8% nationally, and mobility disability registers in the top 9.6% nationally. Crowded housing stands in the top 9.4% nationally.

In plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 74728, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.3%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%28.6–35.7
High blood pressure among adults43.6%39.2–48.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.7–9.4
Current asthma among adults12.4%11.1–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.6–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.0%9.5–12.6
Depression among adults27.1%23.2–31.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%13.7–17.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%36.2–45.1
Obesity among adults38.7%30.7–47.1
Stroke among adults4.9%4.3–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.3%21.9–30.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.1%10.0–14.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.4–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.3–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.4%81.2–85.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.3%50.4–61.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.2%44.2–51.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.5%54.4–72.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%10.7–16.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.0%19.7–26.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.8%31.5–42.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%31.5–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.2%22.9–29.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.3–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%15.4–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.2%17.8–22.6
Any disability among adults45.5%40.5–50.4
Hearing disability among adults12.1%10.8–13.4
Independent living disability among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
Mobility disability among adults22.0%19.1–24.8
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.7%21.8–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.5%20.1–26.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.9%18.6–25.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.3–19.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.7–13.9
Loneliness among adults33.7%28.4–39.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.5–15.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6423.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)13.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription77.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate79.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households64.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+30.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age50.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$52,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$142,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$585$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured