Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

74365

in Salina, OklahomaPopulation 4,277

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

33.37/ 100

Ranked #29,936 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranked #521 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

65.2%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST20th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.5%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.25 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.3%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.5%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

10.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.9%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.7%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST19th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Salina, Oklahoma (ZIP 74365) sits in the bottom 6.7% nationally (29,936th) and the bottom 18% of Oklahoma (521st).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled mammography sits in the bottom 3.1% nationally, hearing disability stands in the top 3.0% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled tooth loss sits in the top 8.3% nationally, crowded housing stands in the top 7.6% nationally, and unemployment resides in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 9.8% nationally, and colon screening stands in the bottom 8.6% nationally. On the stronger side, grocery resides in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 5.4% nationally.

Put plainly, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 74352, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.4–38.4
High blood pressure among adults46.4%42.3–50.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.1–9.9
Current asthma among adults13.0%11.7–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%10.2–12.5
Depression among adults25.0%21.7–28.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%15.1–19.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.8%38.7–47.4
Obesity among adults43.2%36.1–50.8
Stroke among adults5.2%4.9–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.3%20.4–28.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.4%8.9–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.7–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.4–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%83.0–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.7%52.6–62.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.0%46.4–53.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.2%56.9–72.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.4–15.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.8%20.2–25.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.2%32.6–42.4
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%33.3–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.9%24.1–30.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.6–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%16.6–20.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.9%18.1–22.2
Any disability among adults46.6%42.2–51.5
Hearing disability among adults12.5%11.3–13.9
Independent living disability among adults12.2%11.1–13.6
Mobility disability among adults23.3%21.0–26.0
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.4
Vision disability among adults8.4%7.7–9.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.0%23.5–30.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.8%21.1–26.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.6%18.1–23.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.8–18.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.6%11.4–14.0
Loneliness among adults32.5%27.9–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.8–14.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6428.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)10.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle7.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription87.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate78.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households51.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age36.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$51,067$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$120,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$678$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.0 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured