Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74631

in Blackwell, OklahomaPopulation 6,689

33.39/ 100

Ranked #29,933 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranked #520 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

66.9%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST39th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

62 days/year

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.4%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.1%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

32.3%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

23.4%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

21.9%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.85%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Blackwell, Oklahoma (ZIP 74631) stands in the bottom 6.7% nationally (29,933rd) and the bottom 18% of Oklahoma (520th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled mammography is in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and hearing disability registers in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies in the top 7.1% nationally, colon screening is in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and obesity registers in the top 6.1% nationally. Floodplain exposure lies in the top 9.0% nationally, modeled tooth loss is in the top 9.7% nationally, and modeled mobility disability registers in the top 10.0% nationally. Modeled fine-particle lies in the top 10.1% nationally.

For clarity, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 74601, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.5 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $53,964 predicts 77.6 years — 4.1 years below.

    Ranked #5,126 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.5 ± 1.8 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.1 years — 3.5 years below them.

    Ranked #2,758 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.9%30.3–37.5
High blood pressure among adults43.7%39.4–48.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.8–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.6–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
Depression among adults27.4%23.7–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.5%13.5–17.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%37.1–45.9
Obesity among adults44.1%36.5–52.1
Stroke among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.4%19.6–27.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.1%10.2–14.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%76.0–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.6–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%81.9–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.4%51.8–63.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.8%46.9–55.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.9%58.0–75.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%11.0–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.2%18.4–24.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.2%30.3–40.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%30.5–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.0%23.0–29.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.2–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.4–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%17.6–21.9
Any disability among adults44.3%39.7–49.3
Hearing disability among adults11.7%10.4–13.0
Independent living disability among adults12.2%10.8–13.6
Mobility disability among adults21.9%19.4–24.7
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.9%21.0–28.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.4%18.4–24.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.2%17.2–23.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.6–16.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.5–12.3
Loneliness among adults32.4%27.1–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6416.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)9.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription87.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate71.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households51.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+21.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age38.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$53,964$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$86,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$830$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.5 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 73.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured