Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

73015

in Carnegie, OklahomaPopulation 2,240

31.20/ 100

Ranked #30,501 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.9%)

Ranked #565 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 10.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

13.6%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26.2%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

31.1%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST18th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.44 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.88 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.9%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.3%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Carnegie, Oklahoma (ZIP 73015) sits in the bottom 4.9% nationally (30,501st) and the bottom 10.9% of Oklahoma (565th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled hearing disability resides in the top 1.2% nationally, mobility disability sits in the top 2.2% nationally, and nitrate stands in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled mammography resides in the bottom 2.9% nationally, coronary heart disease sits in the top 3.9% nationally, and stroke stands in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes resides in the top 5.8% nationally, and vision disability sits in the top 6.6% nationally. Better still, grocery stands in the top 2.0% nationally, and childcare resides in the top 3.1% nationally.

Put plainly, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 73006, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 54.5; chronic-disease standing 4.5 (bottom 10%) — 50 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,494 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.7%33.2–40.3
High blood pressure among adults48.3%44.3–52.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.8
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.3–14.1
Coronary heart disease among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.8%11.3–14.4
Depression among adults25.3%22.0–29.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.9%16.7–21.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.1%38.1–46.5
Obesity among adults41.2%34.4–48.6
Stroke among adults5.8%5.3–6.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.8%18.2–25.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%12.0–16.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.3–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.3–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.0–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.4%52.0–62.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.3%42.6–49.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.0%56.2–72.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.7–14.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.3%20.5–26.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.9%35.9–46.0
Short sleep duration among adults40.0%33.8–46.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.5%26.0–32.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.9–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults19.4%17.2–21.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.2%18.1–22.5
Any disability among adults48.9%44.3–53.6
Hearing disability among adults13.6%12.2–15.1
Independent living disability among adults13.1%11.7–14.6
Mobility disability among adults26.2%23.2–29.1
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Vision disability among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.4%22.6–30.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.5%22.3–28.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.6%19.5–25.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%14.9–19.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.6%11.1–14.2
Loneliness among adults33.2%28.2–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.5–15.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6424.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)18.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle11.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription79.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate73.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households59.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+20.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$46,806$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$97,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$583$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 1.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.05 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured