Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

99506

in Jber, AlaskaPopulation 7,028

54.70/ 100

Ranked #9,828 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #31 of 211 Alaska ZIPs (top 14.7%)

Ranked #12 of 27 Anchorage, AK ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

16%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

25.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

14.5%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

1.3%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

2.5%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.80%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

49.8%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST33rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

3.8%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

93.7%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

0.17%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 99506, one of several in Jber, Alaska lands in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,828th) and the top 14.7% of Alaska (31st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled high cholesterol registers in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and diabetes lies in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the bottom 0.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking is in the top 0.5% nationally, modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and slow internet speeds resides in the top 0.6% nationally. Homeownership registers in the bottom 0.9% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 99505, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.6%

21%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental HazardPartial

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults7.2%6.4–8.3
High blood pressure among adults14.5%13.0–16.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults1.6%1.4–1.8
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults1.3%1.2–1.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.1%1.8–2.5
Depression among adults24.7%22.0–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults2.5%2.2–2.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened16.0%14.4–18.0
Obesity among adults30.0%26.5–34.0
Stroke among adults0.8%0.7–0.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.9%7.2–10.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.6%9.5–14.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure32.9%30.2–36.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults60.0%56.3–64.0
Cholesterol screening among adults65.9%62.0–69.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years49.8%46.0–53.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%59.1–64.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.6%62.8–73.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults25.5%22.7–29.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.3%8.7–12.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.8%12.6–17.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%31.2–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.6%11.0–14.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.6%18.4–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults8.1%7.2–9.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.4–19.4
Any disability among adults23.9%21.0–27.5
Hearing disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.5
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.7
Mobility disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
Self-care disability among adults1.4%1.3–1.6
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%23.9–31.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.9–15.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.5–9.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.0–15.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.4–11.5
Loneliness among adults41.9%37.8–46.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.7% (1.4–38.0%) n=230
Uninsured 18–642.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28620.8% (8.5–50.0%) n=225
No HS diploma (25+)1.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.4% (1.4–25.1%) n=230
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.0% (0.0–37.4%) n=230
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2748.6% (0.0–29.5%) n=226
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,32231.1% (1.0–95.5%) n=228
Broadband subscription97.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.8% (49.6–96.0%) n=228
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)56.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.0% (0.0–33.2%) n=228
Homeownership rate0.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32271.7% (45.5–94.4%) n=228
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3228.5% (0.0–48.6%) n=228
Foreign-born population4.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–11.1%) n=231
Single-parent households38.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08744.2% (18.7–68.2%) n=221
Population 65+0.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55312.7% (3.0–29.7%) n=231
Median age23.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.7 yr (22.6–53.6) n=226
Median household income$76,258$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,823 ($39,905–$108,850) n=197
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,500 ($66,830–$395,940) n=178
Median gross rent$2,048$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,078 ($688–$1,571) n=143
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured