Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72106

in Mayflower, ArkansasPopulation 6,213

37.86/ 100

Ranked #28,096 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.4%)

Ranked #343 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #51 of 59 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR ZIPs (bottom 13.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST30th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

48.8%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.8%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.5%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.38 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.9%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.2%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.5%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

47.3%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mayflower, Arkansas (ZIP 72106) ranks in the bottom 12.4% nationally (28,096th) and the bottom 39% of Arkansas (343rd).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and grocery sits in the top 7.9% nationally. Pharmacy resides in the top 8.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Working the other way, floodplain exposure sits in the top 4.2% nationally, modeled mammography resides in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and modeled obesity stands in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 9.8% nationally, slow internet speeds resides in the top 9.7% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure stands in the top 9.8% nationally.

Against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 72016, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $65,800 predicts 78.4 years — 5.2 years below.

    Ranked #5,589 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.6 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.6 years — 3.4 years below them.

    Ranked #2,648 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%29.0–35.8
High blood pressure among adults44.9%41.2–49.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.8%9.4–12.5
Depression among adults26.8%23.5–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.7%13.7–18.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.3%38.3–46.8
Obesity among adults44.5%38.7–51.5
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%15.1–21.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%8.8–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.4–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.0–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%82.9–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.9%56.8–66.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.0%52.2–59.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.8%58.1–74.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.3–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.4%16.7–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.6%29.1–39.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%32.6–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.6%23.3–30.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%16.9–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.7–20.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.9%17.7–22.6
Any disability among adults42.4%38.1–47.6
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Independent living disability among adults11.1%9.9–12.7
Mobility disability among adults20.6%18.1–23.7
Self-care disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%22.0–29.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.0–22.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.6–15.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.9–16.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.7–11.4
Loneliness among adults32.9%28.4–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.4–12.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6411.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)13.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle7.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate79.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households40.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+19.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age43.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$65,800$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$205,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$877$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.2 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 73.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured