Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72207

in Little Rock, ArkansasPopulation 10,631

64.64/ 100

Ranked #2,149 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.8%)

Ranked #4 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (top 0.8%)

Ranked #4 of 59 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR ZIPs (top 6.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

130 intersections/sq mi

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.9%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

342 units

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.6%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 72207, one of several in Little Rock, Arkansas sits in the top 6.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,149th) and the top 0.8% of Arkansas (4th).

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: walkability registers in the top 6.4% nationally, modeled food insecurity is in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 7.1% nationally. Recreation registers in the top 7.4% nationally, grocery is in the top 8.6% nationally, and modeled energy burden lies in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Fatal road crashes registers in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and physicians is in the top 10.1% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Against that, modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 4.5% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 72223, about 0.9 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.4 ± 2.0 years. A median household income of $96,343 predicts 79.9 years — 2.5 years above.

    Ranked #655 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.4 ± 2.0 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.2 years — 6.2 years above them.

    Ranked #29 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 82.4 ± 2.0 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.6–27.6
High blood pressure among adults35.3%32.1–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.4
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Depression among adults23.7%20.8–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.5–9.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%32.9–39.4
Obesity among adults33.0%28.7–37.2
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.4%7.0–10.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.8–6.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%72.8–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.4–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.8–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%67.0–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.2%68.5–73.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%74.7–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%14.0–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.4%7.0–9.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.0%16.3–21.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.0%27.5–34.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.0%12.2–15.8
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.8–16.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.4–13.4
Any disability among adults26.5%23.5–29.7
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.6–7.2
Independent living disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.4–12.4
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%18.4–23.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.5–5.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.6–6.0
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.7–33.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)2.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)71.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate68.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households63.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age40.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$96,343$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$406,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$1,028$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured