Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72212

in Little Rock, ArkansasPopulation 13,698

65.08/ 100

Ranked #1,978 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.2%)

Ranked #1 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (top 0.2%)

Ranked #1 of 59 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR ZIPs (top 1.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.0%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.5%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.2%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.1%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.8%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 72212, one of several in Little Rock, Arkansas lands in the top 6.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,978th) and the top 0.2% of Arkansas (1st).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: dental providers lands in the top 4.5% nationally, modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and modeled transportation stands in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 4.6% nationally, housing insecurity registers in the bottom 8.8% nationally, and colon screening resides in the top 6.8% nationally. Poverty settles in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and modeled independent living disability is in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Outpatient sits in the top 11.8% nationally. Working the other way, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 4.5% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. No nearby ZIP ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.6%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.9%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.3%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.6 ± 2.7 years. A median household income of $114,140 predicts 80.6 years — 3.0 years above.

    Ranked #423 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.6 ± 2.7 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.1 years — 7.6 years above them.

    Ranked #3 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 83.6 ± 2.7 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.4–29.7
High blood pressure among adults38.4%35.0–41.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.4–11.3
Current asthma among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.4–5.9
Depression among adults21.9%19.1–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.5–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%35.3–42.0
Obesity among adults32.6%28.3–36.7
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.6%6.3–9.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.7–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.5%75.6–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%79.4–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.6–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.2%69.9–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.7%68.0–73.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%73.5–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.7–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.2%6.8–9.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.8%17.0–22.7
Short sleep duration among adults31.6%28.0–35.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.5–16.3
Frequent mental distress among adults13.3%11.7–14.9
Frequent physical distress among adults10.7%9.3–12.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Any disability among adults26.9%23.7–30.0
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.0–6.5
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.8–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.5–5.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Loneliness among adults29.4%26.0–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)1.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)70.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)0.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription95.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate85.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households46.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+22.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age37.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$114,140$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$338,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$1,102$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.6 yr ± 1.3778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.37 years of 83.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured