Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71068

in Ringgold, LouisianaPopulation 3,482

22.42/ 100

Ranked #31,711 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.2%)

Ranked #492 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 3.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

9.3%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.2%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

23.1%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

16.1%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

28.8%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.6%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.8%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

31.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

53.5%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

23.5%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ringgold, Louisiana (ZIP 71068), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 1.2% nationally (31,711th) and the bottom 3.2% of Louisiana (492nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled self-care disability lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and stroke stands in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled diabetes registers in the top 1.1% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled mobility disability sits in the top 0.9% nationally, vision disability lies in the top 2.6% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled tooth loss resides in the top 2.6% nationally, high blood pressure is in the top 1.3% nationally, and cognitive disability lands in the top 2.0% nationally.

For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 71016, just across the boundary. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 1.6% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.5%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.5%36.0–43.2
High blood pressure among adults53.5%49.4–57.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults12.1%11.0–13.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.3%13.8–17.0
Depression among adults28.2%24.6–32.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults23.1%20.6–25.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.4%40.2–48.8
Obesity among adults48.0%40.2–55.9
Stroke among adults7.2%6.7–7.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.1%26.7–35.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.4%9.7–13.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.6%80.4–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.4–86.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.3–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.4%57.3–67.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.3%42.7–50.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%66.5–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.3–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.2%23.3–29.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.9%38.8–49.1
Short sleep duration among adults43.9%37.5–50.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.8%33.3–40.4
Frequent mental distress among adults21.8%19.7–24.2
Frequent physical distress among adults21.7%19.5–24.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.5%21.2–25.9
Any disability among adults50.4%45.7–55.1
Hearing disability among adults12.0%10.9–13.3
Independent living disability among adults16.1%14.5–17.7
Mobility disability among adults28.8%25.9–31.7
Self-care disability among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Vision disability among adults11.6%10.6–12.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.1%26.4–34.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.8%31.2–38.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults35.1%31.7–38.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.8%20.4–25.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.9%15.2–18.8
Loneliness among adults37.7%32.7–42.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.1%17.1–21.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6417.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)14.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)7.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle8.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription67.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate83.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households62.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+23.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$33,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$118,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$393$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.0 yr ± 1.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 73.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured