Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

35752

in Hollywood, AlabamaPopulation 2,524

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

35.58/ 100

Ranked #29,154 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.1%)

Ranked #519 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.1%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

64.6%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.7%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.3%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

30.4%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Hollywood, Alabama (ZIP 35752) places in the bottom 9.1% nationally (29,154th) and the bottom 16% of Alabama (519th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: fiber broadband rests in the top 4.1% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 5.2% nationally, and mobility disability is in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled pfas lands in the top 6.2% nationally, independent living disability stands in the top 7.9% nationally, and hearing disability registers in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 9.8% nationally, high cholesterol sits in the top 6.5% nationally, and diabetes lies in the top 9.4% nationally. Floodplain exposure rests in the top 9.9% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 35746, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.5%33.9–41.5
High blood pressure among adults48.5%44.0–53.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%9.0–10.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
Depression among adults26.8%23.0–31.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.6%15.6–20.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.1%39.5–48.8
Obesity among adults41.3%33.3–49.7
Stroke among adults5.3%4.9–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.5%18.0–25.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.6%9.8–13.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.4–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.1–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.3–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%60.2–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.3%49.2–57.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%65.1–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%10.6–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.0%18.2–23.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.9%29.9–40.2
Short sleep duration among adults41.7%34.7–48.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.3%26.1–32.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.8–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.3%16.2–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%17.2–21.6
Any disability among adults45.4%40.6–50.4
Hearing disability among adults11.3%10.2–12.7
Independent living disability among adults12.7%11.4–14.2
Mobility disability among adults23.1%20.6–25.9
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.7%7.1–8.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.5%21.8–29.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.5%19.4–25.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.8–20.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.5–16.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.7–12.3
Loneliness among adults33.8%28.6–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.2–12.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6413.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)18.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle11.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription90.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate68.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+20.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age42.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$58,977$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$162,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$964$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.7 yr ± 0.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 74.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured