Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71016

in Lucky, LouisianaPopulation 1,852

34.59/ 100

Ranked #29,529 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.0%)

Ranked #358 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.1%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

71.5%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST17th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.7%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.3%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

136.9 days/year

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.11%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.4%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Lucky, Louisiana (ZIP 71016) comes out in the bottom 8.0% nationally (29,529th) and the bottom 30% of Louisiana (358th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: floodplain exposure lies at the national minimum, modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 5.8% nationally, home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and modeled independent living disability lands in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled mobility disability is in the top 8.7% nationally, and humid heat resides in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 9.8% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 9.1% nationally.

In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 71045, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.8 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 10.2 — 86 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #257 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.9%32.1–39.9
High blood pressure among adults46.1%41.7–50.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.1%10.6–13.7
Depression among adults30.2%26.2–34.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.5%15.4–20.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.5%37.9–47.4
Obesity among adults43.6%35.2–52.2
Stroke among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.2%16.6–24.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.4–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.0–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.2–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.7–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%58.7–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.3%47.4–55.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%68.7–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%12.9–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.0%19.8–26.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.9%31.6–42.6
Short sleep duration among adults40.5%33.6–47.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.3%25.8–33.1
Frequent mental distress among adults21.2%18.9–23.9
Frequent physical distress among adults18.9%16.7–21.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.1%18.6–23.9
Any disability among adults43.8%38.9–49.1
Hearing disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.5
Independent living disability among adults12.7%11.2–14.4
Mobility disability among adults22.3%19.6–25.2
Self-care disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Vision disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.3%23.3–31.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.8%21.1–28.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.3%19.7–26.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.3–19.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
Loneliness among adults36.6%31.3–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.3–15.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)14.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)7.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle7.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription71.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate79.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households38.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+13.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age35.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$41,806$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$114,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.6 yr ± 1.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.56 years of 73.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured