Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71038

in Haynesville, LouisianaPopulation 3,796

20.54/ 100

Ranked #31,851 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 0.7%)

Ranked #502 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 1.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

11.2%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.2%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

14.0%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

18.3%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

31.9%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

24.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

40%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

24.9%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

55.8%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.8%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

Haynesville, Louisiana (ZIP 71038), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 0.7% nationally (31,851st) and the bottom 1.2% of Louisiana (502nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that matter most for this area lead the way: modeled self-care disability rests in the top 0.3% nationally, and stroke resides in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability is in the top 0.8% nationally, and independent living disability lands in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 0.3% nationally, diabetes registers in the top 0.5% nationally, and fair or poor health settles in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 1.1% nationally, high blood pressure lies in the top 0.7% nationally, and coronary heart disease rests in the top 0.9% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 71040, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.3%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.4%36.5–44.2
High blood pressure among adults55.8%51.4–60.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.6–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults12.8%11.6–14.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults16.7%14.9–18.5
Depression among adults26.8%23.0–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.8%22.2–27.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.1%39.5–48.8
Obesity among adults48.7%40.3–57.4
Stroke among adults8.2%7.5–8.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years30.0%25.4–34.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.6%10.4–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.6%81.3–85.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.4%81.5–87.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.3%83.4–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.1%57.5–68.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.2%42.4–50.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%63.8–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%9.9–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults27.3%23.9–30.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults45.8%40.0–51.2
Short sleep duration among adults45.4%38.1–52.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults40.0%36.0–43.8
Frequent mental distress among adults22.1%19.7–24.5
Frequent physical distress among adults22.7%20.2–25.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults24.9%22.3–27.5
Any disability among adults53.0%47.8–57.8
Hearing disability among adults12.2%11.0–13.6
Independent living disability among adults18.3%16.5–20.2
Mobility disability among adults31.9%28.6–35.1
Self-care disability among adults11.2%10.2–12.4
Vision disability among adults14.0%12.7–15.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.9%28.4–37.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults40.3%36.5–44.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults41.6%38.1–45.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.7%23.8–29.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults20.0%17.9–22.2
Loneliness among adults37.8%32.1–43.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults22.8%20.5–25.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate37.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–647.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)25.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)10.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle20.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription47.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate63.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households50.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+24.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age45.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$25,958$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$83,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$441$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.2 yr ± 1.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.06 years of 75.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured