Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71052

in Mansfield, LouisianaPopulation 9,102

23.64/ 100

Ranked #31,598 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.5%)

Ranked #485 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 4.6%)

Ranked #35 of 39 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

9.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.3%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

23.6%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

16.5%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.2%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

33.2%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

28.6%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

37.4%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

48.2%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

54.6%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Mansfield, Louisiana (ZIP 71052) comes out in the bottom 1.5% nationally (31,598th) and the bottom 4.6% of Louisiana (485th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled self-care disability rests in the top 0.9% nationally, vision disability lies in the top 1.9% nationally, and diabetes sits in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled independent living disability settles in the top 1.3% nationally, stroke registers in the top 1.0% nationally, and tooth loss stands in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the top 0.9% nationally, and fair or poor health is in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled short sleep resides in the top 0.8% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the top 0.9% nationally.

The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 71019, just across the boundary. Modeled independent living disability rests in the top 1.3% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Shreveport-Bossier City, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.0 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $38,509 predicts 76.3 years — 4.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,243 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.0 ± 1.7 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.5 years — 3.5 years below them.

    Ranked #2,700 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.7 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 72.0 ± 1.7 years.

    Ranked #1,484 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.8%33.5–40.0
High blood pressure among adults54.6%50.7–58.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.5–7.8
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults10.6%9.7–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.4%12.2–14.7
Depression among adults26.0%22.6–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults23.6%21.3–26.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%37.1–45.1
Obesity among adults50.7%42.8–57.9
Stroke among adults7.2%6.7–7.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years33.2%28.6–37.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.1%10.4–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%80.2–84.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.6%82.0–86.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.7–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%58.4–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults43.3%39.5–47.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.4%71.2–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.1–14.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.2%22.5–28.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.2%38.3–48.0
Short sleep duration among adults48.2%41.2–55.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults37.4%34.1–40.7
Frequent mental distress among adults22.2%20.0–24.4
Frequent physical distress among adults20.6%18.6–22.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.7%21.6–26.0
Any disability among adults50.0%45.6–54.2
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Independent living disability among adults16.5%15.1–18.0
Mobility disability among adults28.6%26.1–31.2
Self-care disability among adults9.7%8.9–10.4
Vision disability among adults12.3%11.4–13.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.2%30.0–38.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults41.2%37.5–45.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults40.6%37.2–44.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.3%25.4–31.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults20.0%18.0–22.0
Loneliness among adults39.7%34.4–45.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults23.3%20.9–25.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6410.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)20.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)11.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle17.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription72.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate66.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households34.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+19.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age39.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$38,509$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$109,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$687$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.0 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 72.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured