Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71072

in Shongaloo, LouisianaPopulation 1,348

48.33/ 100

Ranked #18,507 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #72 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 14.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

15.6%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

44.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

9.0%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

132.8 days/year

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

6.4%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Shongaloo, Louisiana (ZIP 71072) sits in the bottom 42% nationally (18,507th) and the top 14.2% of Louisiana (72nd).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled arsenic lands in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and pfas rests in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle settles at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, unemployment settles in the top 3.4% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the top 9.2% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat lands in the top 10.6% nationally.

Put plainly, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 71006, about 6.6 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.3 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 32.3 — 63 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,527 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.5%29.6–37.3
High blood pressure among adults42.9%38.3–47.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.4–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.5–10.6
Depression among adults26.6%22.8–30.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%11.8–16.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.1%37.6–46.8
Obesity among adults35.6%28.2–43.4
Stroke among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%9.9–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%4.9–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.9%79.1–84.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%79.0–85.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.0%87.1–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.0%63.9–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.7%62.0–68.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%68.4–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%13.9–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%12.7–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.1%23.3–33.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%27.8–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%18.0–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.5–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%13.8–18.4
Any disability among adults37.2%32.2–42.5
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.6–11.3
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.6–10.4
Mobility disability among adults17.5%14.8–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.5–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.5–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.8%21.0–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%10.6–16.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.0–12.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.0–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.0–8.3
Loneliness among adults32.7%27.9–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.8–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6431.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)5.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)15.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription80.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate83.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households78.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+22.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age48.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$83,472$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$102,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 2.3078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.30 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured