Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

30332

in Atlanta, GeorgiaPopulation 2,567

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

53.93/ 100

Ranked #10,789 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #171 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #107 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

13.2%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

10.2%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

1.3%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

0.80%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.50%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

24.1%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

17.9%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

49%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

2.8%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 30332, one of several in Atlanta, Georgia, by its overall standing, sits in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,789th) and the top 24% of Georgia (171st).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled high cholesterol settles in the bottom 0.4% nationally, high blood pressure registers in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and diabetes stands in the bottom 0.2% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally, stroke is in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and obesity resides in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the bottom 0.3% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking lies in the top 0.8% nationally, and loneliness sits in the top 0.3% nationally. Slow internet speeds settles at the national maximum.

Held up against its neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 30318, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.07%

21%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.2%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.5%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.5%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 17.0; chronic-disease standing 99.9 (top 1%) — 83 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,405 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults3.8%3.1–4.5
High blood pressure among adults10.2%8.5–12.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults0.8%0.6–0.9
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.6–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults0.8%0.7–1.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults1.9%1.4–2.5
Depression among adults26.0%22.2–29.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults1.3%1.1–1.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened13.2%11.4–15.3
Obesity among adults17.9%14.5–21.3
Stroke among adults0.5%0.4–0.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%8.3–16.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure17.8%14.3–21.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults64.7%60.0–68.9
Cholesterol screening among adults64.0%57.9–69.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.9%55.4–62.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults24.1%20.3–28.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.5%4.3–8.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.1%11.5–19.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%32.9–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.1%10.1–16.7
Frequent mental distress among adults26.0%21.5–29.6
Frequent physical distress among adults8.2%6.5–9.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.3%17.6–26.7
Any disability among adults28.9%23.2–34.3
Hearing disability among adults2.5%2.0–3.0
Independent living disability among adults10.0%7.7–12.3
Mobility disability among adults2.8%2.1–3.6
Self-care disability among adults1.3%1.0–1.6
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.1–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%19.5–28.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%11.7–23.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%6.3–14.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%8.1–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.4%9.9–16.5
Loneliness among adults49.0%43.6–54.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%4.7–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate—10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–643.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)95.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)17.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle—3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription—89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)—23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate—78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)—1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population9.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households—53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age19.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income—$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value—$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured