Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68956

in Kenesaw, NebraskaPopulation 1,140

60.19/ 100

Ranked #4,720 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.8%)

Ranked #64 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (top 11.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.8 pCi/L

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.8%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.3%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.9%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

2.3%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.1%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Kenesaw, Nebraska (ZIP 68956) ranks in the top 14.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,720th) and the top 11.4% of Nebraska (64th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled loneliness stands in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and short sleep settles in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Outpatient lies in the top 3.1% nationally, and childcare resides in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 4.4% nationally, transportation registers in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Against that, modeled radon rests in the top 2.6% nationally, binge drinking is in the top 3.5% nationally, and nitrate stands in the top 5.5% nationally.

In plainer terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 68955, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 21.1; chronic-disease standing 75.5 — 54 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,848 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.4%23.7–29.2
High blood pressure among adults34.4%31.1–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.9–10.6
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%4.9–6.8
Depression among adults18.9%16.3–21.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%8.9–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.8%30.6–37.2
Obesity among adults38.7%33.8–43.6
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.8–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.0–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.5–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%75.3–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.9–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%57.8–66.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.4%68.4–74.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%70.2–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.9%18.0–23.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%9.4–13.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.3%18.8–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults27.3%23.1–32.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.3%12.0–16.6
Frequent mental distress among adults12.6%11.0–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.0%9.5–12.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.8
Any disability among adults25.3%21.8–28.7
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.5
Independent living disability among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Mobility disability among adults11.4%9.7–13.4
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.4–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.0–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%15.9–22.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.4–10.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.2–7.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.3–7.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.0–5.6
Loneliness among adults26.8%23.0–30.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–645.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription96.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate90.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households61.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age48.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$94,231$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$203,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$772$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured