Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28533

in Cherry Point, North CarolinaPopulation 2,452

58.34/ 100

Ranked #6,125 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #128 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

13.0%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

13.3%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

25.3%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

1.8%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

1.1%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.60%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

3.1%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

45.5%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.3%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Cherry Point, North Carolina (ZIP 28533) ranks in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,125th) and the top 16% of North Carolina (128th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and stroke sits in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Modeled hearing disability resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and fatal road crashes stands at the national minimum. Modeled transportation noise sits at the national minimum. On the other side, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 0.5% nationally, slow internet speeds stands at the national maximum, and modeled loneliness sits in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the top 2.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands at the national minimum.

Against its neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 28512, about 12 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.5%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.7%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.9%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults4.0%3.3–4.8
High blood pressure among adults13.3%11.1–16.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults0.7%0.6–0.8
Current asthma among adults8.5%7.4–9.8
Coronary heart disease among adults1.1%0.9–1.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults1.9%1.5–2.3
Depression among adults24.1%20.5–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults1.8%1.5–2.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened13.0%10.8–15.7
Obesity among adults26.5%20.7–33.9
Stroke among adults0.6%0.5–0.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.0%15.8–24.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.4%12.3–20.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure19.5%16.2–23.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults65.3%60.1–70.7
Cholesterol screening among adults61.0%55.8–67.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%61.8–72.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.8%65.1–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.9%61.7–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults25.3%20.9–30.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.4%6.1–10.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.3%13.8–23.0
Short sleep duration among adults27.0%21.5–33.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%11.7–17.5
Frequent mental distress among adults22.4%19.0–25.4
Frequent physical distress among adults7.7%6.4–8.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.9%18.8–26.0
Any disability among adults32.2%26.3–37.5
Hearing disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.8
Independent living disability among adults8.1%6.6–9.3
Mobility disability among adults3.1%2.5–3.7
Self-care disability among adults1.4%1.1–1.5
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.6–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.4%23.3–33.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.9%14.5–22.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%7.6–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.0–14.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.7–15.3
Loneliness among adults45.5%39.2–51.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.8–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age21.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured