Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68748

in Madison, NebraskaPopulation 2,706

48.90/ 100

Ranked #17,797 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #507 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 10.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

8.7%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Radon

4.8 pCi/L

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

44.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

2.0%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.7%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.66 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.7%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.6%

in the bottom 12.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Madison, Nebraska (ZIP 68748), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 44% nationally (17,797th) and the bottom 10.5% of Nebraska (507th).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled energy burden lies in the top 0.6% nationally, modeled radon settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and fatal road crashes stands in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled nitrate is in the top 5.6% nationally, colon screening rests in the bottom 6.9% nationally, and uninsured sits in the top 7.9% nationally. Crowded housing registers in the top 9.1% nationally. On the encouraging side, civic lands in the top 8.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Pharmacy lies in the top 11.6% nationally.

In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 68631, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 12.8; chronic-disease standing 70.3 — 58 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,159 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.0%20.7–25.5
High blood pressure among adults34.6%31.4–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.8–7.8
Depression among adults15.1%13.0–17.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%32.2–38.8
Obesity among adults41.9%36.8–47.1
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%11.1–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.8%13.8–20.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.4–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.7%70.4–76.9
Cholesterol screening among adults82.0%79.9–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.7%51.7–61.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.0%53.3–60.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.6%61.8–76.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.6–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%13.0–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.3%28.0–36.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%29.2–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.4%17.8–23.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.4–15.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%12.0–15.5
Any disability among adults29.8%26.2–33.7
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.1–8.9
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.2–16.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.6
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.2–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.5–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.0%16.0–22.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.0–14.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.4–15.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.3
Loneliness among adults31.0%26.7–35.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6418.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)25.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription86.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate77.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population28.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households46.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+18.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$69,740$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$148,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$962$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured