Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68768

in Pilger, NebraskaPopulation 731

55.81/ 100

Ranked #8,509 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #199 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.4 pCi/L

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.3%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.2%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.25%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.2%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

17.2%

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Pilger, Nebraska (ZIP 68768) places in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,509th) and the top 35% of Nebraska (199th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and loneliness stands in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 12.3% nationally, and cognitive disability settles in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation lies in the bottom 15% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled radon rests in the top 1.0% nationally, binge drinking resides in the top 5.2% nationally, and nitrate is in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled fine-particle lands in the top 14.5% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 68641, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.8%24.7–31.0
High blood pressure among adults35.4%31.6–39.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.1–8.3
Depression among adults16.1%13.7–18.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.2–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%32.5–40.6
Obesity among adults39.4%32.6–46.4
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.1–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.8–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.4–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%72.9–79.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.9–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.8%61.4–71.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.7%61.0–68.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%67.2–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.3%17.4–23.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%11.3–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%23.2–32.0
Short sleep duration among adults29.2%23.4–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.2%13.9–18.9
Frequent mental distress among adults13.0%11.5–14.7
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.0–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%9.9–12.9
Any disability among adults27.9%24.3–32.0
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.1–8.0
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.4–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%16.6–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.0–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.4–8.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.3–8.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.4
Loneliness among adults28.2%23.7–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6414.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)2.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)0.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle0.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription81.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate75.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households49.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+22.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age45.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$78,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$196,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$533$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured