Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68634

in Duncan, NebraskaPopulation 635

61.72/ 100

Ranked #3,685 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.5%)

Ranked #46 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (top 8.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

26.1%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

29.1%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.3%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.4%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.8%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.8%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.3%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Duncan, Nebraska (ZIP 68634) stands in the top 11.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,685th) and the top 8.2% of Nebraska (46th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and short sleep stands in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Poverty sits in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity resides in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Fiber broadband stands in the top 6.5% nationally, modeled transportation sits in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and homeownership resides in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Working the other way, modeled transportation noise sits in the top 1.3% nationally, and binge drinking resides in the top 4.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Among the ZIPs nearby, none ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.8%23.1–28.6
High blood pressure among adults34.6%31.3–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.6–10.7
Current asthma among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Depression among adults16.0%13.7–18.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.1–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.1–39.1
Obesity among adults40.2%35.1–45.7
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.2%4.9–7.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.8–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.0–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%74.0–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.7–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.8%65.5–74.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.6%65.4–71.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%73.1–85.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%17.5–23.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%10.4–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%18.8–26.4
Short sleep duration among adults27.3%22.8–32.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.5%11.4–16.0
Frequent mental distress among adults12.7%11.0–14.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%9.7–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.3%8.8–11.9
Any disability among adults25.3%21.7–29.2
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.1–6.9
Mobility disability among adults11.1%9.3–13.0
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%16.6–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.6–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.5–7.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.5–8.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.1–5.9
Loneliness among adults26.1%22.0–30.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.9–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–641.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)7.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription74.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate95.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households47.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+10.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age21.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$74,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$165,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$1,313$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 2.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.03 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured