Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66531

in Riley, KansasPopulation 1,256

59.22/ 100

Ranked #5,427 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #54 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 8.0%)

Ranked #5 of 21 Manhattan, KS ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

Under 0.1 mi

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27.8%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

50.9%

in the top 12.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.5%

in the bottom 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.5%

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

30.8%

in the bottom 13.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.5%

in the bottom 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Riley, Kansas (ZIP 66531), on the composite measure, lands in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,427th) and the top 8.0% of Kansas (54th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: fiber broadband lies at the national maximum, modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 9.2% nationally, and modeled obesity stands in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Modeled transportation is in the bottom 11.1% nationally, homeownership rests in the top 11.7% nationally, and poverty sits in the bottom 12.5% nationally. On the other hand, distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and modeled radon lands in the top 6.8% nationally. Fatal road crashes resides in the top 11.8% nationally, and modeled extreme heat lies in the top 12.5% nationally.

In everyday language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 66449, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Manhattan, KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 32.1; chronic-disease standing 83.4 — 51 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,519 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.3%23.4–29.4
High blood pressure among adults30.8%27.5–34.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.2–7.1
Depression among adults21.4%18.5–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.5%8.2–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.9%30.3–37.8
Obesity among adults27.8%23.1–33.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.3–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.5–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.8–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.6%73.4–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.3–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%62.5–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.6%68.6–74.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%70.8–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.9%15.1–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%10.3–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.2%17.7–25.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%27.8–37.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.5%12.3–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.2–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults11.6%10.1–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%10.8–14.5
Any disability among adults27.3%23.8–31.2
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.3–14.0
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.6%15.7–21.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.8–10.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.6–5.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.9–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.2
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.3–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.2–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–644.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)2.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate93.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households54.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+21.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$79,063$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$188,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$1,203$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured