Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20763

in Savage, MarylandPopulation 2,601

65.82/ 100

Ranked #1,689 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.3%)

Ranked #70 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #33 of 157 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.1%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.9%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.6%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.1%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

41.2%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.2%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.3%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.1%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Savage, Maryland (ZIP 20763) places in the top 5.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,689th) and the top 15% of Maryland (70th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, and modeled hearing disability is in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the bottom 3.0% nationally, and mammography stands in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the bottom 3.4% nationally, stroke settles in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and energy burden sits in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lies in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 4.5% nationally, and homeownership resides in the bottom 5.6% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 20723, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 29.4; chronic-disease standing 93.2 (top 10%) — 64 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,778 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.2%19.0–23.3
High blood pressure among adults31.7%28.8–34.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.6%3.0–4.3
Depression among adults19.2%16.7–21.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%32.3–38.3
Obesity among adults33.8%29.4–38.2
Stroke among adults2.2%2.0–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.6%3.7–5.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.7–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.6%67.4–73.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.7–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.6–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%59.6–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.0%68.4–73.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.6%77.3–87.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.2–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.9%6.3–9.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.9%13.3–18.7
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%34.2–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.7%10.8–14.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.2–15.6
Frequent physical distress among adults9.5%8.2–10.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.3%8.8–11.8
Any disability among adults20.7%17.9–23.7
Hearing disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Independent living disability among adults5.1%4.4–5.9
Mobility disability among adults8.1%6.8–9.4
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.8–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.2–13.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.3–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.5–13.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Loneliness among adults31.4%27.5–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.1–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)10.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)8.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription90.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate41.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population16.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households33.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+5.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$76,842$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$419,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,989$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.6 yr ± 2.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.46 years of 81.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured