Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66218

in Shawnee, KansasPopulation 8,820

67.84/ 100

Ranked #1,054 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.3%)

Ranked #12 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 1.8%)

Ranked #13 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (top 6.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$168,878

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

5.9%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.0%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

10.1%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.9%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.8%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.4%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 66218, one of several in Shawnee, Kansas ranks in the top 3.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,054th) and the top 1.8% of Kansas (12th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: household income sits in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled food insecurity rests in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Modeled transportation is in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and loneliness stands in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally, stroke lies in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Against that, distance to a Superfund site registers at the national minimum, and modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 3.7% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 66220, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 13.4; chronic-disease standing 95.1 (top 10%) — 82 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,318 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.8%17.9–21.9
High blood pressure among adults28.3%25.9–30.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.5–7.8
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults3.8%3.3–4.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.6%3.0–4.1
Depression among adults19.1%16.9–21.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.8–38.0
Obesity among adults30.9%27.6–34.3
Stroke among adults1.9%1.7–2.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.4%4.3–6.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.0%4.1–6.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.5%70.6–76.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%76.0–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.4–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%61.8–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.3%74.0–78.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%73.9–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.2%17.0–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.0%7.3–10.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.0%13.7–18.4
Short sleep duration among adults31.0%27.9–34.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.1%8.7–11.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.1%11.7–14.8
Frequent physical distress among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.7
Any disability among adults20.4%18.0–23.0
Hearing disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Independent living disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Mobility disability among adults7.4%6.3–8.5
Self-care disability among adults2.0%1.7–2.2
Vision disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults16.1%14.0–18.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.8–7.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults2.8%2.2–3.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–8.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Loneliness among adults27.0%24.1–29.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–645.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)2.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription98.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate89.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households47.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+7.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$168,878$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$436,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$1,733$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 0.9978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.99 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured