Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62629

in Chatham, IllinoisPopulation 15,413

63.88/ 100

Ranked #2,520 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.9%)

Ranked #98 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 7.2%)

Ranked #2 of 30 Springfield, IL ZIPs (top 6.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.3%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.7%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.9%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.4%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.2%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.6%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.4%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.5%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Chatham, Illinois (ZIP 62629) sits in the top 7.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,520th) and the top 7.2% of Illinois (98th).

continue reading

What works most in this area's favor shows up clearly across the measures: lead in tap water is at the national minimum, modeled transportation rests in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and modeled food insecurity sits in the bottom 6.2% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the bottom 5.3% nationally, fair or poor health lands in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and cognitive disability resides in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and stroke settles in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Modeled independent living disability stands in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled binge drinking is in the top 5.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 62711, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.0 ± 1.6 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.1 years — 3.9 years above them.

    Ranked #407 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.5%20.6–26.7
High blood pressure among adults30.0%26.3–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Depression among adults20.8%17.7–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.4%7.2–9.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%29.3–37.8
Obesity among adults35.2%28.2–43.0
Stroke among adults2.4%2.1–2.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.3%5.0–8.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%4.0–6.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.1%70.7–77.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%74.8–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.2%87.6–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.8%61.9–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.7%68.3–75.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%67.7–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.3%16.9–24.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.7%7.9–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.7%12.7–19.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%26.5–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.4%10.5–14.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.0–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
Any disability among adults22.1%18.7–25.8
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Independent living disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Mobility disability among adults8.9%7.5–10.4
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.0–2.6
Vision disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.1–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.3–9.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.3–8.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.3–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Loneliness among adults31.3%26.5–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–643.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)1.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle0.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription92.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate81.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households41.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+12.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age36.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$107,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$243,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,256$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.0 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 82.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured