Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65534

in Laquey, MissouriPopulation 502

45.68/ 100

Ranked #21,675 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #404 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

30 mi

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Park land

50.5%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

78.3%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.2%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

16.5 mi

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

The read

Laquey, Missouri (ZIP 65534), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 32% nationally (21,675th) and the top 41% of Missouri (404th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled short sleep stands in the top 8.6% nationally, and distance to an emergency room resides in the top 8.9% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the better side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 2.0% nationally, and park land resides in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 5.5% nationally, and tree cover stands in the top 5.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 10.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 65473, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%28.0–35.2
High blood pressure among adults37.8%33.4–42.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.0–9.8
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.5–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Depression among adults25.8%22.0–29.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.6–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.2–42.1
Obesity among adults38.7%30.7–46.7
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.4%14.9–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.6–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.5–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.0–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.5–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.1%58.7–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.6%53.7–61.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.9%61.0–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.0–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.4%15.4–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.9%24.9–34.8
Short sleep duration among adults42.2%35.3–49.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.7%18.7–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%15.9–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.6–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.0%15.7–20.3
Any disability among adults37.5%32.6–42.2
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.4–10.9
Mobility disability among adults16.9%14.6–19.3
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.5%16.8–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.3–16.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.0–13.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.1–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.2–9.6
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.1–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6415.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)11.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate92.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households75.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+15.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age49.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$72,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$150,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured