Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65260

in Jacksonville, MissouriPopulation 384

50.50/ 100

Ranked #15,544 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #178 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

7.8%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.8 ppb

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

US92nd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

57.7 mi

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Jacksonville, Missouri (ZIP 65260), by its overall standing, sits in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,544th) and the top 18% of Missouri (178th).

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: modeled pfas resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 9.3% nationally, and modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 12.8% nationally. Crowded housing settles at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 14.7% nationally, and disaster risk stands in the bottom 17% nationally. Set against that, PFAS in drinking water lands at the national maximum, and lead in tap water is in the top 8.1% nationally. Slow internet speeds resides in the top 14.0% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 65239, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%29.4–35.6
High blood pressure among adults38.1%34.6–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.2–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.6–9.8
Depression among adults24.6%21.7–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.9–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%35.9–43.6
Obesity among adults35.8%29.9–42.7
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.4%11.2–15.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%5.9–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.5–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.7–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.6–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%62.2–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.5%58.2–64.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%69.5–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.3–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.4–19.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.9%24.1–32.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%32.8–43.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.6–22.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.1–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.4–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.5–18.2
Any disability among adults35.4%31.6–39.6
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.0
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.6
Mobility disability among adults15.9%14.0–18.1
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.7%16.1–21.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.9–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.7–9.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.2–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.7
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.8–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–644.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)13.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription84.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate87.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households72.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age47.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$49,792$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$88,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$783$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 1.2778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.27 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured