ZIP code
65077
in Steedman, MissouriPopulation 437
49.66/ 100
Ranked #16,710 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)
Ranked #202 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 20%)
Ranked #15 of 31 Jefferson City, MO ZIPs (top 48%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
PFAS in drinking water
4.0%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.00%
in the bottom 4.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
97.9%
in the top 5.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
98.4%
in the top 6.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
17.6 mi
in the top 7.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
1.3%
in the top 8.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
67.1%
in the top 10.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS89thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
10.0%
in the bottom 25% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS25thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›The read
Steedman, Missouri (ZIP 65077), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 48% nationally (16,710th) and the top 20% of Missouri (202nd).
The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: distance to an emergency room registers in the top 7.6% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 8.9% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled pfas sits in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and poverty lies at the national minimum. Modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 4.7% nationally, homeownership resides in the top 5.8% nationally, and fiber broadband is in the top 6.0% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover registers in the top 10.7% nationally.
For anyone unfamiliar, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 65024, about 1.3 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jefferson City, MO metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 74%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 83%
14%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 41%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 48%
13%
Disability
healthier than 41%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 41%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 42%
5%
Holding it back
Risk Behavior
healthier than 24%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 40%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 62%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 81%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 68%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 72%
8%
Disability
healthier than 73%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 64%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 57%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 46%
5%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 70%
16%
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.00%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 63%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 77%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 60%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 53%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 43%
11%
Disability
healthier than 43%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 23%
21%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
63388
Missourishares a border
Score 47.35
Closest healthier
65024
Missouriabout 1.3 mi away
Score 50.73
Similar health profile
63072
Missouri89% similar profile
Score 48.94
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.2% | 28.5–36.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 39.7% | 35.4–44.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.5% | 8.5–10.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.7% | 9.4–12.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.6% | 6.6–8.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.0% | 7.4–10.7 |
| Depression among adults | 24.4% | 20.8–28.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.0% | 11.0–15.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.5% | 35.9–45.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.1% | 30.5–46.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.8% | 3.3–4.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 10.0% | 8.0–12.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.5% | 5.6–9.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 78.3% | 75.1–81.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.8% | 75.1–82.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.7% | 84.4–88.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.4% | 59.7–70.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 61.9% | 58.1–65.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 72.1% | 64.0–79.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.3% | 13.3–19.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.3% | 14.6–21.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 28.6% | 23.4–33.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.6% | 31.1–44.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 20.7% | 17.2–24.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.0% | 14.8–19.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.3% | 13.1–17.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.7% | 14.1–19.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 35.4% | 30.3–40.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.9% | 7.7–10.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.6% | 7.3–10.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 16.2% | 13.5–19.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.1% | 3.4–4.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.8% | 4.1–5.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.2% | 15.9–22.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.7% | 9.0–14.7 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.9% | 6.6–11.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.7% | 8.5–12.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.3% | 6.1–8.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.9% | 24.0–33.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.9% | 6.5–9.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 4.6% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 10.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 12.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009 |
| Broadband subscription | 94.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 22.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009 |
| Homeownership rate | 97.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010 |
| Single-parent households | 44.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005 |
| Population 65+ | 20.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010 |
| Median age | 43.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005 |
| Median household income | $80,625 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948 |
| Median home value | $197,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $813 ($553–$1,265) n=786 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.2 yr ± 2.18 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.18 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured