Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64858

in Racine, MissouriPopulation 586

43.51/ 100

Ranked #23,899 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #512 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #15 of 31 Joplin, MO-KS ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.2%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.2%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.9%

in the bottom 13.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Racine, Missouri (ZIP 64858), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 25% nationally (23,899th) and the bottom 48% of Missouri (512th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and fine-particle settles in the top 8.6% nationally. More encouragingly, housing-cost burden registers at the national minimum, modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and homeownership lands at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription is at the national maximum, and modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 8.4% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 64804, about 1.6 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Joplin, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.0%32.5–41.4
High blood pressure among adults42.6%37.6–47.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.0–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%8.5–12.5
Depression among adults25.5%21.6–29.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%12.6–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.9%36.8–46.8
Obesity among adults40.3%31.8–49.4
Stroke among adults4.6%4.0–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.2%13.9–20.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%5.7–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%78.4–84.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%78.6–85.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%86.6–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.2%51.7–62.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.5%54.6–62.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%61.8–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.9%10.4–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.5%14.4–22.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.8%25.5–38.2
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%31.6–45.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.9%18.7–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.0–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%14.4–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%14.4–20.1
Any disability among adults38.9%33.1–44.7
Hearing disability among adults10.8%9.5–12.3
Independent living disability among adults10.2%8.5–12.0
Mobility disability among adults20.0%16.5–23.7
Self-care disability among adults4.8%3.9–5.8
Vision disability among adults5.9%4.9–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.7%15.4–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%10.8–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.4–14.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.5–14.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.9–9.7
Loneliness among adults28.2%23.3–33.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.4–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households79.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+34.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age58.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$314,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.2 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 75.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured