Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58341

in Harvey, North DakotaPopulation 2,572

50.30/ 100

Ranked #15,842 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #319 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 14.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

201.4 mi

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST63rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.83 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

89 µg/L

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.7%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST67th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Harvey, North Dakota (ZIP 58341) lands in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,842nd) and the bottom 14.1% of North Dakota (319th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 1.0% nationally, and childcare settles in the top 1.3% nationally. Pharmacy lies in the top 1.6% nationally, and dental providers resides in the top 1.9% nationally. Elder services lands in the top 3.1% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and fiber broadband sits in the top 5.4% nationally. Against that, modeled hearing disability rests in the top 3.8% nationally, lithium in drinking water is in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the top 7.6% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 58368, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 53%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.7%33.2–40.5
High blood pressure among adults42.3%38.2–46.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.2%11.0–13.5
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.3–11.3
Depression among adults19.4%16.5–22.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%12.6–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%36.5–45.1
Obesity among adults38.7%31.8–46.1
Stroke among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.8%14.7–21.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.9–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.1%81.7–86.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.2–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.4–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%60.9–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.1%56.4–63.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%66.9–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.7–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%13.0–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.7%24.1–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.3%25.7–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.6–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.3–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.2–14.8
Any disability among adults35.3%30.9–39.9
Hearing disability among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.0–10.7
Mobility disability among adults18.6%16.0–21.4
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%16.9–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.4–13.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.4–10.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.9–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Loneliness among adults28.4%23.8–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.9–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription81.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate72.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+25.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$61,641$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$139,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$649$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.5 yr ± 1.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 76.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured