ZIP code
64066
in Levasy, MissouriPopulation 98
44.28/ 100
Ranked #23,133 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)
Ranked #467 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 47%)
Ranked #157 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (bottom 22%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Floodplain exposure
96.9%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
7.7%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
40.7%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 4.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS5thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
2.4%
in the top 4.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
6.7%
in the bottom 6.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 6.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS7thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.03%
in the bottom 12.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST7thUS13thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
8.8 mi
in the top 14.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS86thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Outer-floodplain exposure
2.1%
in the top 14.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS85thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Levasy, Missouri (ZIP 64066) comes out in the bottom 28% nationally (23,133rd) and the top 47% of Missouri (467th).
The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: floodplain exposure stands in the top 0.4% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 0.5% nationally, and modeled transportation noise is in the top 0.7% nationally. Slow internet speeds resides in the top 4.9% nationally, and modeled tree cover rests in the bottom 12.8% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 6.2% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.
Relative to the ZIPs around it, floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 64088, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 67%
21%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 52%
16%
Disability
healthier than 41%
7%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 7%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 35%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 33%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 8%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 3%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 35%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 86%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 73%
11%
Disability
healthier than 72%
7%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 58%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 45%
13%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 9%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 4%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.4%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 35%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 58%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 42%
11%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 32%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 24%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 34%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 6%
8%
Disability
healthier than 36%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 14%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
64088
Missourishares a border
Score 48.04
Closest healthier
64016
Missouriabout 0.2 mi away
Score 49.65
Similar health profile
70665
Louisiana98% similar profile
Score 43.25
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 27.0% | 24.3–29.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 32.2% | 29.4–35.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.7% | 7.8–9.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–11.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.6% | 5.6–7.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.6% | 6.1–9.1 |
| Depression among adults | 28.1% | 25.1–31.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.5% | 8.0–10.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.3% | 35.2–41.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 32.9% | 29.0–36.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.4% | 2.9–4.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.2% | 11.7–17.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.6% | 6.4–11.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 74.0% | 71.2–76.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.4% | 72.4–78.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.8% | 80.9–86.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 68.3% | 63.8–72.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 64.2% | 61.2–67.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.7% | 67.5–79.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 18.5% | 16.1–21.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 16.4% | 13.0–19.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 28.8% | 24.2–33.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.1% | 29.5–36.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.4% | 16.1–22.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.2% | 17.7–22.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.1% | 12.0–16.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.4% | 15.6–21.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 36.9% | 32.3–41.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.9% | 7.7–10.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.5% | 7.9–11.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 15.2% | 12.5–17.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.5% | 2.9–4.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.5% | 3.7–5.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.0% | 18.8–25.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 9.5–15.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 6.4–11.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.0% | 9.6–14.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.8% | 6.4–9.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.7% | 29.8–37.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.2% | 6.7–9.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 16.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 4.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 18.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009 |
| Broadband subscription | 93.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 6.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009 |
| Homeownership rate | 60.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010 |
| Single-parent households | 52.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005 |
| Population 65+ | 26.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010 |
| Median age | 32.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005 |
| Median household income | $82,083 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948 |
| Median home value | $187,500 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930 |
| Median gross rent | $1,361 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $813 ($553–$1,265) n=786 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.1 yr ± 1.41 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.41 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured