Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28457

in Rocky Point, North CarolinaPopulation 11,464

49.31/ 100

Ranked #17,216 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #422 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #20 of 28 Wilmington, NC ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Park land

21%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

57.1%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

30.2%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.4%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

118.1 days/year

in the top 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

Rocky Point, North Carolina (ZIP 28457), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 46% nationally (17,216th) and the bottom 47% of North Carolina (422nd).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: lead in tap water lies at the national minimum, park land settles in the top 6.6% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the bottom 1.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled pfas is in the top 9.3% nationally, floodplain exposure rests in the top 10.0% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 10.0% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 13.5% nationally, and humid heat lands in the top 14.4% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 16% nationally, and modeled disaster risk lies in the top 17% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 28411, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Wilmington, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.1%24.8–31.6
High blood pressure among adults36.7%32.5–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Depression among adults25.7%22.0–29.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.5–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%30.7–39.5
Obesity among adults37.9%30.2–46.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.3%10.7–16.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.4–14.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%72.8–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.5–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.7–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%59.6–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%59.6–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%70.6–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.4–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%13.6–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.5%20.2–28.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%27.0–40.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.6%17.7–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%15.9–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.3–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.5%14.4–18.5
Any disability among adults33.7%29.0–38.3
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.3–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%20.0–27.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.1%13.7–18.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.9–15.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.2–15.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Loneliness among adults33.3%28.1–38.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6414.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)12.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription91.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate84.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population6.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households44.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+11.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age36.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$78,178$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$245,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$912$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured