Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63879

in Wardell, MissouriPopulation 694

33.39/ 100

Ranked #29,934 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranked #900 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 9.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mobility disability

23.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

35.3%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.7%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.1%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.6%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.0%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.4%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.4%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Wardell, Missouri (ZIP 63879) stands in the bottom 6.7% nationally (29,934th) and the bottom 9.4% of Missouri (900th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: fiber broadband stands in the top 6.3% nationally. Working the other way, modeled mobility disability sits in the top 5.3% nationally, and poverty resides in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled energy burden stands in the top 4.0% nationally, cognitive disability sits in the top 5.8% nationally, and tree cover resides at the national minimum. Modeled tooth loss stands in the top 6.6% nationally, independent living disability sits in the top 6.8% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the top 9.6% nationally. Modeled self-care disability stands in the top 9.1% nationally.

For clarity, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 63827, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.7%33.9–41.6
High blood pressure among adults45.0%40.6–49.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.6–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.9%11.2–14.7
Depression among adults25.7%22.1–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.4%15.2–19.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.6%39.1–48.2
Obesity among adults42.6%34.8–50.8
Stroke among adults5.4%4.8–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.6%21.5–30.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%8.4–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.1–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.3–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.5–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%54.9–65.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.5%47.8–55.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%66.9–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.7%10.3–15.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.7%19.3–26.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.8%33.3–44.4
Short sleep duration among adults40.8%34.2–47.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.4%25.7–33.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%16.7–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults19.2%16.7–21.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.1%18.4–23.9
Any disability among adults45.2%39.9–50.4
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.3–11.8
Independent living disability among adults13.0%11.3–14.7
Mobility disability among adults23.8%20.8–26.9
Self-care disability among adults6.4%5.6–7.2
Vision disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.3%18.1–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%17.3–24.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.8%15.9–22.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.9–17.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.7–12.8
Loneliness among adults32.8%27.9–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.6–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate35.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6416.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)17.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle9.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription87.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate82.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households64.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+28.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age53.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$41,083$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$56,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$469$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 2.4778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.47 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured