Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63138

in Saint Louis, MissouriPopulation 18,233

35.51/ 100

Ranked #29,186 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.0%)

Ranked #849 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 14.6%)

Ranked #212 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 9.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Utility shut-off threat

22.4%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

28%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.9%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.7%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17.6%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.5%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

51.1%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Park land

35.7%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

39.9%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 63138, one of several in Saint Louis, Missouri places in the bottom 9.0% nationally (29,186th) and the bottom 14.6% of Missouri (849th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 1.6% nationally, and housing insecurity resides in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled short sleep is in the top 3.2% nationally, and independent living disability lands in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the top 3.6% nationally, modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 4.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled loneliness sits in the top 4.4% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water lies at the national maximum. More encouragingly, park land rests in the top 3.8% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 62048, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.6 ± 1.8 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.3%26.9–31.9
High blood pressure among adults45.6%42.6–48.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Current asthma among adults13.5%12.1–15.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Depression among adults22.4%19.8–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.2%15.4–19.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.4%31.6–37.3
Obesity among adults43.3%39.2–47.7
Stroke among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.6%20.3–29.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.3–13.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.5–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.2%78.7–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.7–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.6%59.9–68.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.1%45.3–52.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%71.3–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.8–14.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.1%18.6–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.9%34.1–41.8
Short sleep duration among adults44.9%40.4–49.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.1%26.2–32.1
Frequent mental distress among adults21.1%19.1–23.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.6–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.5%19.4–23.8
Any disability among adults43.2%39.7–46.8
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults13.7%12.3–15.2
Mobility disability among adults21.1%19.0–23.5
Self-care disability among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Vision disability among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.3%26.1–32.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.6%28.1–35.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.1%26.7–33.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.0%25.2–31.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.8–19.6
Loneliness among adults39.9%36.4–43.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults22.4%20.1–25.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6419.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)7.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle9.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate49.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households38.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+11.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age33.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$56,096$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$139,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,161$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.6 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 76.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured