Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62048

in Hartford, IllinoisPopulation 1,347

43.80/ 100

Ranked #23,613 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #1,210 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 11.6%)

Ranked #196 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

52 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

15.7%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Park land

19.9%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.7%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$40,946

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

21.5%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

17.2 days/year

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US74th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US68th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Hartford, Illinois (ZIP 62048) sits in the bottom 26% nationally (23,613th) and the bottom 11.6% of Illinois (1,210th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum, fatal road crashes settles in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lands in the top 4.0% nationally. PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum, modeled loud transportation noise settles in the top 9.7% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 12.0% nationally. Household income rests in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and modeled mammography settles in the bottom 13.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. On the stronger side, park land rests in the top 7.0% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 62025, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%26.9–33.5
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.7–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.4
Depression among adults23.4%19.9–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.6–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%33.3–41.8
Obesity among adults40.0%33.2–47.2
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%11.8–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.7–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.4–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%73.7–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.3–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.8%56.2–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.9%53.9–61.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.9%60.7–77.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.0–21.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%13.9–19.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.5%21.1–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults36.5%30.0–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%18.4–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.4–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.5–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.0–17.1
Any disability among adults34.4%30.2–39.1
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Mobility disability among adults16.0%13.8–18.4
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.8%22.3–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.2–18.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.5%12.9–18.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.6–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.3
Loneliness among adults34.1%29.5–39.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.8–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–649.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)7.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)4.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate84.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households50.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+30.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age45.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$40,946$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$65,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$984$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 1.3078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.30 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured