Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36201

in Anniston, AlabamaPopulation 16,993

27.41/ 100

Ranked #31,181 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.8%)

Ranked #600 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 3.1%)

Ranked #11 of 11 Anniston-Oxford, AL ZIPs (bottom 9.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

48.1%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.9%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

51.5%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.1%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.0%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

20%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

27.6%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 36201, one of several in Anniston, Alabama, overall, ranks in the bottom 2.8% nationally (31,181st) and the bottom 3.1% of Alabama (600th).

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled short sleep registers in the top 0.9% nationally, independent living disability resides in the top 2.5% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health is in the top 2.9% nationally, high blood pressure sits in the top 2.2% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled vision disability lies in the top 4.9% nationally, and diabetes stands in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 2.4% nationally, and tooth loss registers in the top 4.7% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 36203, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Anniston-Oxford, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 1.0%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.0 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $37,614 predicts 76.2 years — 5.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,602 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.0 ± 1.0 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 74.1 years — 3.1 years below them.

    Ranked #2,449 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 71.0 ± 1.0 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.8%31.3–38.4
High blood pressure among adults51.5%47.3–55.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.4–7.8
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.4–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.0%10.8–13.3
Depression among adults25.0%21.4–29.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.0%17.8–22.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.5%37.2–45.9
Obesity among adults45.3%38.3–52.7
Stroke among adults5.9%5.5–6.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.6%23.3–32.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.2%12.1–16.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.7–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.4–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%80.9–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%55.8–66.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults42.9%39.0–46.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%65.6–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.4%10.1–15.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.7%19.9–25.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.3%36.3–46.4
Short sleep duration among adults48.1%41.6–54.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.7%31.3–38.2
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.7–23.4
Frequent physical distress among adults19.0%17.0–21.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.8%19.5–24.1
Any disability among adults46.7%42.1–51.4
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Independent living disability among adults15.1%13.7–16.6
Mobility disability among adults25.1%22.6–27.7
Self-care disability among adults7.9%7.3–8.5
Vision disability among adults10.0%9.3–10.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.5%25.7–33.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.3%31.1–37.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.2%27.2–33.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%20.2–25.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.5%14.8–18.3
Loneliness among adults39.4%34.4–44.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.2–19.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6425.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)19.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)10.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle14.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription76.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate58.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households38.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+19.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$37,614$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$80,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$728$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth70.9 yr ± 0.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.50 years of 70.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured