Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63070

in Pevely, MissouriPopulation 8,428

47.30/ 100

Ranked #19,789 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #306 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #158 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

376 units

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.5%

in the top 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 14.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

38.3%

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

35.5%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Pevely, Missouri (ZIP 63070) lands in the bottom 38% nationally (19,789th) and the top 31% of Missouri (306th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 6.4% nationally, and grocery resides in the top 14.3% nationally. Against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 9.0% nationally, and loud transportation noise registers in the top 11.5% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 14.1% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Distance to an emergency room is in the top 16% nationally, modeled obesity stands in the top 14.9% nationally, and households without a vehicle settles in the top 18% nationally. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 62295, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.2 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $65,211 predicts 78.4 years — 3.2 years below.

    Ranked #4,338 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%25.8–31.6
High blood pressure among adults34.7%31.3–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.6
Depression among adults25.6%22.3–29.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%9.8–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%31.9–39.3
Obesity among adults41.6%35.5–47.7
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.0–16.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.4–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.6%72.8–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%74.1–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.7%80.7–84.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%58.2–67.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.9%54.2–61.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%65.7–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.8–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.6%16.3–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.5%25.4–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%32.4–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.5%19.1–24.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.3–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.3–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.0%17.1–21.2
Any disability among adults37.0%32.9–41.1
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.6–17.4
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%17.2–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.8–16.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.4–13.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.6–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.7–10.0
Loneliness among adults31.0%26.6–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.0–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)10.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle9.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription88.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate73.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households44.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+12.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age33.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$65,211$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$210,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$871$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.2 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 75.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured