Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47612

in Cynthiana, IndianaPopulation 818

50.91/ 100

Ranked #14,984 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #226 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.55%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

82.8 days/year

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US68th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

8.8 days/year

in the top 38% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US62nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.14%

in the top 44% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US56th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Cynthiana, Indiana (ZIP 47612) stands in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,984th) and the top 30% of Indiana (226th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: recreation sits in the top 6.6% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 0.8% nationally, and arsenic stands in the top 10.8% nationally. Physicians sits at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Childcare resides at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. Unemployment stands in the top 22% nationally, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 23% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 47639, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%26.9–33.4
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.8–41.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–10.1
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.2–9.7
Depression among adults25.6%22.1–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.6–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%33.7–41.9
Obesity among adults39.7%32.2–47.4
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%12.2–17.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.3–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.3–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%76.7–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.1–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%65.1–73.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.1%63.0–69.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%67.9–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%13.7–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.4–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%19.7–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%28.6–40.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%17.2–23.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.6–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.2–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.1–17.1
Any disability among adults31.5%27.3–36.0
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.2–16.2
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.0–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.5–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.9–14.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.3–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.0–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.7
Loneliness among adults32.3%27.7–37.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription93.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate86.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households40.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age35.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$73,438$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$122,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$753$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured