Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47639

in Haubstadt, IndianaPopulation 4,730

52.36/ 100

Ranked #12,954 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #167 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

18.6%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

10.0%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

29.9%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

6.0%

in the bottom 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

10.6%

in the bottom 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US29th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

8.7 days/year

in the top 38% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US62nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Haubstadt, Indiana (ZIP 47639) sits in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,954th) and the top 22% of Indiana (167th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: housing-cost burden registers in the bottom 13.4% nationally, unemployment is in the bottom 15% nationally, and dental providers lies in the top 15% nationally. Modeled transportation registers in the bottom 17% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure is at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 0.6% nationally, and arsenic registers in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled transportation noise is in the top 13.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 47725, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.4%28.1–34.7
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.7–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.7–8.9
Depression among adults25.9%22.6–29.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.5–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%35.0–43.3
Obesity among adults38.2%31.1–45.8
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.7–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.9–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%77.0–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%78.2–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.6–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.8%64.2–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.4%64.2–70.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%69.5–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%13.7–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%12.8–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.5%18.6–26.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%31.1–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.3–20.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.7–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.8–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Any disability among adults29.7%25.8–33.9
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.1
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.2–8.0
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.5–15.4
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.5–24.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.2–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.4–6.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.9–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Loneliness among adults29.9%25.3–34.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–641.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)2.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)0.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate84.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households62.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+19.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age41.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$97,930$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$276,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$898$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured