Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62060

in Madison, IllinoisPopulation 3,558

35.38/ 100

Ranked #29,243 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.9%)

Ranked #1,342 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 2.0%)

Ranked #213 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 9.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

50.2%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29.1%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.8%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

19.3%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

26.8%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

18.5%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

33.9%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.2 mi

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.9%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By its overall health score, Madison, Illinois (ZIP 62060) lands in the bottom 8.9% nationally (29,243rd) and the bottom 2.0% of Illinois (1,342nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that define the ground here come first: modeled obesity lies in the top 0.6% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep lands in the top 2.2% nationally, and unemployment registers in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity sits in the top 3.0% nationally, utility shutoff rests in the top 3.4% nationally, and self-care disability is in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled food insecurity stands in the top 4.0% nationally, distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and modeled diabetes lies in the top 5.8% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 62040, just across the boundary. On a broader view, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 13%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%27.5–34.4
High blood pressure among adults47.2%42.8–51.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.6–6.9
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.1–14.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.1–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
Depression among adults19.5%16.5–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.9%16.5–21.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%32.2–40.5
Obesity among adults50.2%43.1–57.3
Stroke among adults5.7%5.2–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.1%24.5–34.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.7%9.8–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.9–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.2%77.9–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.8–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%56.8–67.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.0%45.1–53.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%66.6–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%10.9–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.3%16.5–22.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.2%29.0–39.1
Short sleep duration among adults45.8%38.9–52.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.2%26.5–33.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.6–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.1–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.2–19.4
Any disability among adults40.0%35.2–44.5
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Independent living disability among adults12.8%11.3–14.2
Mobility disability among adults22.0%19.4–24.7
Self-care disability among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Vision disability among adults9.0%8.2–9.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.0%30.8–39.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults33.9%30.3–37.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults36.1%32.5–40.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.8%24.0–30.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.9%14.2–17.9
Loneliness among adults39.1%34.0–44.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.5%16.6–20.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–643.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)16.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)19.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle11.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription80.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate50.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population4.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households38.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+15.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$46,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$63,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,063$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.6 yr ± 1.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.11 years of 72.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured