Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62013

in Brussels, IllinoisPopulation 578

54.39/ 100

Ranked #10,198 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #399 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #74 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

47.1%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.6%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.1%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.1%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.0%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.5%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.6%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.6%

in the bottom 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Brussels, Illinois (ZIP 62013), overall, ranks in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,198th) and the top 29% of Illinois (399th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, this area's strong points come through first: modeled pfas rests in the bottom 6.0% nationally, transportation registers in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and utility shutoff resides in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 9.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled tooth loss sits in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Set against that, floodplain exposure lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and crowded housing lies in the top 6.6% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure stands in the top 7.2% nationally, and walkability rests in the bottom 10.3% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". ZIP 62006, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.2–35.1
High blood pressure among adults36.4%31.9–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.2–12.5
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.0–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%5.8–8.1
Depression among adults21.4%17.9–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.2–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%34.3–44.2
Obesity among adults33.9%25.9–43.1
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.6%5.2–8.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.3–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%76.5–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%77.5–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%89.0–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%59.4–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.4%66.7–73.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%64.1–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.2–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.2–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.6%16.5–25.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%25.7–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%13.4–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.2–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.1–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.4%9.8–13.2
Any disability among adults28.4%24.0–33.1
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.8–8.8
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.1–8.3
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.3–15.9
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.5–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.6–10.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.6–9.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.1–9.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.2–5.9
Loneliness among adults31.2%26.1–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.8–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6410.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate83.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households43.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+20.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age33.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$72,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$144,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.0 yr ± 2.4878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.48 years of 86.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured