Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77356

in Montgomery, TexasPopulation 32,583

56.61/ 100

Ranked #7,638 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #234 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 12.6%)

Ranked #56 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

155.9 days/year

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

57.1 days/year

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

38 per million

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

91.2%

in the top 14.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

11.5%

in the bottom 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

30%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

77.8%

in the top 27% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US73rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 77356, one of several in Montgomery, Texas places in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,638th) and the top 12.6% of Texas (234th).

continue reading

The standout strengths in the data are the natural place to begin: modeled energy burden settles in the bottom 8.0% nationally, and radon sits in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Fiber broadband lies in the top 14.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat rests in the top 3.2% nationally, expected annual loss resides in the top 5.2% nationally, and extreme heat is in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 7.9% nationally, industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 12.0% nationally, and disaster risk registers in the top 12.8% nationally. Floodplain exposure settles in the top 14.4% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 77316, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.0 ± 1.2 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.2 years — 2.8 years above them.

    Ranked #942 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 38.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 81.0 ± 1.2 years.

    Ranked #1,747 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.9%26.4–33.2
High blood pressure among adults37.4%33.3–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.8–11.8
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Depression among adults21.6%18.4–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.7–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%37.5–46.1
Obesity among adults30.0%24.0–36.5
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.8–10.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%8.0–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.0–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.9–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults90.1%88.9–91.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.6%64.7–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.5%61.4–67.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%71.8–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%13.6–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.7%9.0–12.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.2%17.6–24.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%30.7–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.4–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.9–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%10.9–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%10.1–12.9
Any disability among adults27.8%24.0–31.7
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.8
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.7–15.4
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6414.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate81.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households63.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+26.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age48.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$106,804$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$409,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,589$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured