Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66533

in Rossville, KansasPopulation 1,595

56.10/ 100

Ranked #8,173 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #84 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 12.4%)

Ranked #12 of 57 Topeka, KS ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

35.3%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.6%

in the bottom 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

8.1%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.2%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.8%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.6%

in the bottom 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

Rossville, Kansas (ZIP 66533), on the composite measure, lands in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,173rd) and the top 12.4% of Kansas (84th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: elder services settles in the top 2.1% nationally, modeled transportation stands in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and modeled food insecurity is in the bottom 10.4% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 12.1% nationally, and modeled mammography sits in the top 10.1% nationally. On the other hand, outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 6.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled radon resides in the top 13.4% nationally, and transportation noise lies in the top 11.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles in the top 12.8% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 66615, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Topeka, KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.9–29.5
High blood pressure among adults36.6%33.9–39.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Depression among adults22.8%20.4–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%38.0–43.8
Obesity among adults34.7%31.1–38.3
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%8.1–11.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.3–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.4–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%77.1–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%86.0–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.3%67.1–73.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.4%65.8–71.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.2%75.7–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%14.0–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%11.1–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.3%18.5–24.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%31.4–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%13.8–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.1–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.5–14.8
Any disability among adults29.4%26.4–32.7
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Mobility disability among adults12.7%11.1–14.4
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%16.9–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.1–10.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.4–5.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Loneliness among adults30.0%26.9–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.9–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–643.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)3.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription90.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate66.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households57.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+23.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age37.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$62,237$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$195,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$930$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured