Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60959

in Piper City, IllinoisPopulation 904

44.82/ 100

Ranked #22,601 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #1,157 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #47 of 48 Champaign-Urbana, IL ZIPs (bottom 2.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to an emergency room

18.9 mi

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

20.4%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

22.6 mi

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.4%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.01%

in the bottom 11.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.8%

in the top 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.1%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.3%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

4.7%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Piper City, Illinois (ZIP 60959), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 30% nationally (22,601st) and the bottom 15% of Illinois (1,157th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 10.3% nationally. Working the other way, distance to an emergency room sits in the top 6.3% nationally, modeled arsenic registers in the top 6.3% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 6.8% nationally. Unemployment resides in the top 7.2% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover settles in the bottom 11.3% nationally, and energy burden stands in the top 11.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Walkability rests in the bottom 16% nationally.

In everyday language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 60921, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Champaign-Urbana, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%29.9–37.4
High blood pressure among adults41.4%36.8–45.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%9.9–12.2
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%8.7–11.7
Depression among adults21.8%18.4–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.5–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%35.8–45.1
Obesity among adults37.7%29.7–46.2
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.5%13.1–20.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.2–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.6–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%76.5–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.8–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%56.4–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.8%55.5–64.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.9%62.4–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.2–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%13.0–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.8%22.8–33.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%30.2–45.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%19.3–25.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.6–16.5
Any disability among adults35.5%30.8–40.4
Hearing disability among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.5–11.2
Mobility disability among adults18.5%15.7–21.4
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.1%20.5–28.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.2–17.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.0–17.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.3–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Loneliness among adults32.2%27.1–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6414.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)11.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription81.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate68.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households59.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+21.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age51.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$54,583$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$94,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$763$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured