Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58351

in Minnewaukan, North DakotaPopulation 380

40.66/ 100

Ranked #26,302 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #356 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 4.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

196.5 mi

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST61st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.7 pCi/L

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

6.0%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

38.3 mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.9%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.3%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.6%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.8%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18 per million

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Minnewaukan, North Dakota (ZIP 58351) stands in the bottom 18% nationally (26,302nd) and the bottom 4.1% of North Dakota (356th).

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: modeled radon registers in the top 3.2% nationally, and slow internet speeds lies in the top 2.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center is in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled hearing disability registers in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled energy burden lies in the top 4.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease is in the top 5.1% nationally. More positively, distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 1.1% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and modeled loneliness is in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 6.7% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 58301, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.7%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.7%31.8–39.7
High blood pressure among adults45.6%41.1–50.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.1%9.7–12.8
Depression among adults20.3%17.1–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.4%14.2–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%38.4–47.9
Obesity among adults42.3%34.5–50.7
Stroke among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.5%14.4–20.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.2–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.6%79.8–85.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.8–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.3–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%60.3–71.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.0%52.0–59.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%64.1–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.4–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.4%17.4–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.3%26.3–36.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%28.9–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.3%22.0–29.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.4%12.6–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%14.7–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.7
Any disability among adults37.6%32.8–42.7
Hearing disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.7
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
Mobility disability among adults19.5%16.8–22.4
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%18.6–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.3–20.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.4–15.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.9–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.8–10.4
Loneliness among adults26.9%22.8–32.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–649.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)9.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription73.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate74.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households51.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age48.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$72,917$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$112,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$590$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.8 yr ± 1.4778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.47 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured