Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How the Champaign-Urbana, IL metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the Champaign-Urbana, IL metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 202648 of 48 ZIP codes scored · 0.24M residents represented

Score snapshot

55.34Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
54.73Median scoremiddle of 48 scored ZIPs
64.52Highest score61874 · Savoy
42.14Lowest score61866 · Rantoul
22.38Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#98Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
32%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.08M of 0.24M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.24MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0.24MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0ZIPs in the national top 100

The Champaign-Urbana, IL metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 48 of 48
  1. 2,20261874in Savoy · 8,811 residents64.52
  2. 2,64961822in Champaign · 27,642 residents63.62
  3. 3,41061853in Mahomet · 14,831 residents62.17
  4. 3,75761840in Dewey · 612 residents61.60
  5. 3,92661843in Fisher · 1,934 residents61.33
  6. 4,69861845in Foosland · 233 residents60.22
  7. 5,23161864in Philo · 2,003 residents59.47
  8. 5,35761873in St. Joseph · 5,779 residents59.31
  9. 5,48461875in Seymour · 846 residents59.16
  10. 5,91461854in Mansfield · 1,299 residents58.58
  11. 6,10361859in Ogden · 1,227 residents58.36
  12. 6,14761880in Tolono · 4,367 residents58.30
  13. 6,28661884in White Heath · 973 residents58.14
  14. 6,44461839in De Land · 558 residents57.95
  15. 6,58661871in Royal · 296 residents57.78
  16. 7,07361856in Monticello · 8,226 residents57.20
  17. 7,12561863in Pesotum · 844 residents57.16
  18. 7,49861821in Champaign · 28,611 residents56.76
  19. 7,57961851in Ivesdale · 279 residents56.67
  20. 7,80361872in Sadorus · 620 residents56.46
  21. 7,88861815in Bondville · 335 residents56.38
  22. 8,47261816in Broadlands · 377 residents55.83
  23. 8,71561802in Urbana · 20,293 residents55.62
  24. 9,09261852in Longview · 172 residents55.30
  25. 10,49361801in Urbana · 27,891 residents54.16
  26. 10,89661849in Homer · 1,961 residents53.85
  27. 11,15461877in Sidney · 1,106 residents53.65
  28. 11,71561847in Gifford · 1,144 residents53.25
  29. 11,90361878in Thomasboro · 1,127 residents53.12
  30. 12,05761830in Cisco · 510 residents53.02
  31. 12,66861818in Cerro Gordo · 1,560 residents52.57
  32. 12,67960949in Ludlow · 564 residents52.56
  33. 12,84761862in Penfield · 581 residents52.44
  34. 13,44061936in La Place · 170 residents52.01
  35. 13,58260957in Paxton · 5,596 residents51.90
  36. 14,20861855in Milmine · 24 residents51.44
  37. 14,25661929in Hammond · 672 residents51.41
  38. 14,85261813in Bement · 2,043 residents50.99
  39. 16,29061820in Champaign · 40,599 residents49.97
  40. 16,39360933in Elliott · 258 residents49.90
  41. 18,58760919in Cabery · 520 residents48.27
  42. 19,83860946in Kempton · 413 residents47.27
  43. 20,02661773in Sibley · 367 residents47.11
  44. 20,63860952in Melvin · 683 residents46.60
  45. 21,04560962in Roberts · 589 residents46.24
  46. 21,79560936in Gibson City · 4,246 residents45.59
  47. 22,60160959in Piper City · 904 residents44.82
  48. 25,09861866in Rantoul · 13,470 residents42.14
Open the full Champaign-Urbana, IL metro ranking →One page, all 48 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

Where each domain sits inside this metro

The Score above is one number for the whole Champaign-Urbana, IL metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.

The highest-standing fifth

10 of 48 ZIPs

Share of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.

Healthcare Access73%174,604 people

Standing highest: 61801 Urbana61820 Champaign61821 Champaign

Chronic Disease Burden56%134,415 people

Standing highest: 61801 Urbana61820 Champaign61874 Savoy

Social Need / SDOH30%71,657 people

Standing highest: 61822 Champaign61853 Mahomet61874 Savoy

Disability28%65,994 people

Standing highest: 61822 Champaign61843 Fisher61853 Mahomet

Risk Behavior24%57,154 people

Standing highest: 61822 Champaign61840 Dewey61874 Savoy

Climate / Disaster Risk23%53,677 people

Standing highest: 60919 Cabery60933 Elliott60946 Kempton

Mental Health21%49,556 people

Standing highest: 61822 Champaign61845 Foosland61874 Savoy

Environmental Hazard6%14,564 people

Standing highest: 60933 Elliott60946 Kempton61815 Bondville

Preventive Care6%14,121 people

Standing highest: 61840 Dewey61845 Foosland61871 Royal

Each fifth is about 10 of this metro’s 48 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 238,166 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.

The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.

Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Champaign-Urbana, IL figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.