Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60921

in Chatsworth, IllinoisPopulation 1,458

46.06/ 100

Ranked #21,281 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #1,076 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

41.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

21.9 mi

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

58.9%

in the bottom 11.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

8.3 mi

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

37.5 mi

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US80th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Chatsworth, Illinois (ZIP 60921), overall, ranks in the bottom 34% nationally (21,281st) and the bottom 21% of Illinois (1,076th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Set against that, fatal road crashes sits in the top 6.5% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 7.2% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 11.2% nationally, and distance to a nursing home rests in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking resides in the top 14.9% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 15% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. ZIP 60929, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.2–32.3
High blood pressure among adults36.8%32.2–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.9
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.5–10.0
Depression among adults23.4%19.6–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.7–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%33.1–42.2
Obesity among adults37.7%29.0–46.0
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.4%13.9–21.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%7.0–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%73.7–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%73.6–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.7–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.9%52.8–64.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.5%55.2–63.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.3%61.0–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%15.1–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%13.9–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.3%21.3–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%29.6–44.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%17.8–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%15.9–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%12.9–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%12.9–17.0
Any disability among adults32.2%27.4–36.5
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.9–10.3
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.1–17.4
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%20.9–28.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.6–18.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.3%12.7–18.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.2–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Loneliness among adults33.7%28.4–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–648.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription89.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate74.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households45.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+15.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$78,333$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$107,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$733$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.50 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured