Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60480

in Willow Springs, IllinoisPopulation 5,388

59.13/ 100

Ranked #5,508 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #207 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #165 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

68.7%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

72.8%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

14.8%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.4%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.5 mi

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

28.2%

in the bottom 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

37.9%

in the top 31% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US69th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Willow Springs, Illinois (ZIP 60480) sits in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,508th) and the top 15% of Illinois (207th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: park land sits in the top 1.2% nationally, modeled obesity registers in the bottom 11.9% nationally, and dental providers lands in the top 12.1% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the bottom 10.8% nationally. Working the other way, modeled pfas lies in the top 3.7% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the top 4.4% nationally, and loud transportation noise is in the top 5.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the bottom 8.8% nationally, and modeled binge drinking sits in the top 8.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 60439, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 4.7 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 80.8 — 76 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,930 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%23.1–27.7
High blood pressure among adults30.9%28.3–33.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.1
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.5–7.3
Depression among adults20.5%18.1–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%34.5–40.1
Obesity among adults28.2%24.9–31.4
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.9%6.4–9.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%6.6–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%73.4–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%76.0–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.1%88.7–91.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.1%59.2–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.8%62.8–68.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%69.4–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%17.3–21.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.7%9.1–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.2%16.9–22.1
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%29.7–36.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%14.2–18.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.2%12.7–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.6
Any disability among adults25.3%22.8–28.2
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.3
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.5
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.2–13.4
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%20.2–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.9–13.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.7–10.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.5–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.2–6.8
Loneliness among adults31.2%28.2–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–646.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)5.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription93.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate83.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population20.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households54.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+19.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$98,917$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$363,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,463$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured