Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60439

in Lemont, IllinoisPopulation 24,192

61.23/ 100

Ranked #3,982 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.5%)

Ranked #147 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 10.8%)

Ranked #123 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

16 ppb

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

67%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27.1%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.4%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Park land

14.4%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Lemont, Illinois (ZIP 60439) lands in the top 12.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,982nd) and the top 10.8% of Illinois (147th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled obesity rests in the bottom 9.4% nationally, modeled cognitive disability registers in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and park land resides in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff settles in the bottom 9.7% nationally. On the other side, lead in tap water is in the top 0.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits at the national minimum. Modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 3.7% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled pfas stands in the top 5.3% nationally, and binge drinking rests in the top 6.6% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, lead in tap water runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. On the overall standing, ZIP 60464, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 5.0 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 83.7 — 79 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,096 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%23.0–27.2
High blood pressure among adults30.2%27.8–32.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%9.0–10.5
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Depression among adults20.4%18.2–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.5%8.4–10.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%34.1–39.4
Obesity among adults27.1%24.2–30.1
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.8%6.6–9.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.4–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%74.1–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%76.3–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.1–91.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%61.4–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%68.0–73.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%70.0–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.9%17.8–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.7%8.6–11.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.6%15.6–19.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%28.5–34.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%13.0–15.9
Frequent mental distress among adults13.8%12.5–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.9%9.9–12.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Any disability among adults24.1%21.8–26.4
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Mobility disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%19.5–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.6–5.7
Loneliness among adults30.9%28.1–33.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–643.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)44.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate87.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population16.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households53.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+21.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age45.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$121,724$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$480,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,115$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured