Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60172

in Roselle, IllinoisPopulation 24,141

60.32/ 100

Ranked #4,615 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.4%)

Ranked #175 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 12.8%)

Ranked #145 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

78.7%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

11.1%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.9%

in the bottom 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

30.1%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Roselle, Illinois (ZIP 60172) stands in the top 14.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,615th) and the top 12.8% of Illinois (175th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: fatal road crashes lands in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Walkability rests in the top 13.0% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability lands in the bottom 11.4% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Working the other way, modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 0.4% nationally, pfas lands in the top 2.2% nationally, and transportation noise settles in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 7.4% nationally, and loud transportation noise lands in the top 11.5% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 60108, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 2.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 85.7 — 83 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,419 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.1%20.8–25.5
High blood pressure among adults30.5%27.6–33.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Depression among adults19.2%16.8–21.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.8–39.3
Obesity among adults30.1%26.0–34.5
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%8.0–11.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%6.2–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.9%73.0–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.8–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.9–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.1%59.8–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.1%66.2–71.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%69.3–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.8–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.9–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%17.0–22.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%30.8–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%13.4–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%13.2–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Any disability among adults23.5%20.8–26.4
Hearing disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.2
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Mobility disability among adults11.0%9.7–12.5
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%21.2–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.0–13.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.0–10.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Loneliness among adults32.9%29.4–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–645.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate79.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population21.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households50.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age42.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$110,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$346,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,637$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured