Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60514

in Clarendon Hills, IllinoisPopulation 9,918

67.90/ 100

Ranked #1,040 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.3%)

Ranked #43 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 3.2%)

Ranked #43 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 11.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

4.6%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

20.7%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

76.2%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.4%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.7%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.6%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.2%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Clarendon Hills, Illinois (ZIP 60514) sits in the top 3.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,040th) and the top 3.2% of Illinois (43rd).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled transportation is in the bottom 3.2% nationally, cognitive disability rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and utility shutoff lands in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Working the other way, modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 1.6% nationally, and transportation noise lies in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled pfas settles in the top 2.8% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled tree cover is at the national minimum.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 60521, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.3 ± 2.5 years. A median household income of $118,716 predicts 80.8 years — 2.5 years above.

    Ranked #641 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.3 ± 2.5 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.9 years — 3.4 years above them.

    Ranked #612 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 9.5 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 90.9 (top 10%) — 81 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,291 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.7%20.1–25.5
High blood pressure among adults29.8%26.7–33.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.8
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.3–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.8–5.1
Depression among adults18.2%15.5–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.8%7.6–10.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.8%32.2–39.7
Obesity among adults28.6%24.2–33.3
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.5%5.2–8.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.4%3.6–5.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%73.9–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.7–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.5%89.2–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%59.5–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.4%72.5–78.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%70.8–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.0–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.3%12.7–18.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%27.9–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.6%10.0–13.4
Frequent mental distress among adults12.6%11.0–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.7%7.5–10.0
Any disability among adults19.7%17.1–22.6
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Independent living disability among adults5.1%4.4–5.7
Mobility disability among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.0–2.5
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%17.1–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.8–7.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.9–5.1
Loneliness among adults29.7%25.9–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)2.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)68.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription97.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate77.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population15.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households41.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+14.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age41.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$118,716$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$566,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,231$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.3 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 83.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured